Experts' understanding of the Scientific Concept of Development

專家解讀科學(xué)發(fā)展觀

Why did the CPC Central Committee put forward the Scientific Concept of Development?

中央為何提出科學(xué)發(fā)展觀？

The Scientific Concept of Development was put forward at the Third Plenary Session of the 16th CPC National Congress in 2003. It shows the new central leadership's deeper, innovative understanding regarding the connotation, essence and nature of development.

        2003年，十六屆三中全會(huì)明確提出科學(xué)發(fā)展觀，是新一屆中央領(lǐng)導(dǎo)集體對發(fā)展內(nèi)涵、發(fā)展要義、發(fā)展本質(zhì)的進(jìn)一步深化和創(chuàng)新。

Wang Huaichao, Deputy Director of the Department of Social Sciences of the Party School of CPC Central Committee, pointed out that after the reform and opening-up policy was introduced in 1978, the CPC Central Committee made a strategic decision to shift its focus onto socialist modernization construction. The Party's basic line, including keeping economic development as the central task and building up socialism with Chinese characteristics, gradually took shape. In the early 1990s, the CPC Central Committee formulated the principle of fast, coordinated and sustainable development. In particular, it put forth the sustainable development strategy. While propelling economic development, the CPC Central Committee took into consideration the population, resources and environment. It also began to foster harmony between man and nature. In the 10th Five-Year Plan (2001-2005), the people-first concept was put forward. However, in day-to-day works, some local governments still kept their eyes glued on economic growth, especially GDP increases. Thus, they devoted less attention to the development of society and people.

        中央黨校科社部副主任王懷超分析說，改革開放后，中央做出了把工作重心轉(zhuǎn)移到社會(huì)主義現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)上來這一戰(zhàn)略決策，并逐步形成了以經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)為中心和建設(shè)有中國特色社會(huì)主義理論的基本路線。20世紀(jì)90年代初，黨中央又制定了快速、協(xié)調(diào)和持續(xù)發(fā)展的方針，特別是制定并開始實(shí)施可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略，開始注意經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與資源、環(huán)境和人口的協(xié)調(diào)問題，開始注意人與自然的和諧發(fā)展。"十五"計(jì)劃進(jìn)一步提出了"以人為本"的思想。但是，各地在實(shí)踐中大都還是把經(jīng)濟(jì)增長，特別是GDP（國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值）增長作為發(fā)展的核心，客觀上對社會(huì)發(fā)展和人的發(fā)展重視不夠。

Zheng Xinli, Deputy Director of the Policy Research Office of the CPC Central Committee, had his own understanding of the background of the formulation of the Scientific Concept of Development. He pointed out that first of all, the concept was put forward when a series of prominent issues cropped up inChina's economic and social development. Since 1978,Chinahas made much headway in its economic development. However, it was also undeniable that the country was suffering from a series of problems, such as uneven development, uncoordinated development and a weak capacity to maintain sustainable development. Specifically speaking, the divide between urban and rural areas kept enlarging, the pressure on employment was intensifying, the gap between different regions was widening, the reserve of resources was diminishing and the eco-environment was deteriorating. During this period, social development obviously lagged behind economic advancement. After the 9th Five-Year Plan period (1996-2000), great efforts were made to improve the economic growth mode, which once led to a significant decrease in consumption. However, in the past two years, the former extensive economic growth mode was discovered again in some regions. While some of the problems were unavoidable, given the current stage of development, some resulted from a faulty understanding of development. In order to solve various problems in day-to-day works, the CPC Central Committee put forward the concept of comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable development. The concept was formulated in accordance with the real conditions ofChinain order to meet the pressing needs of overall development of the country.

        中央政策研究室副主任鄭新立指出：首先，科學(xué)發(fā)展觀是針對當(dāng)前我國經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)發(fā)展中存在的突出問題和矛盾提出來的。改革開放以來，我國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展取得了舉世矚目的巨大成就，但不可否認(rèn)，也存在一系列突出的矛盾和問題，發(fā)展不夠全面，也不夠協(xié)調(diào)，持續(xù)發(fā)展能力較弱，如城鄉(xiāng)差距拉大、就業(yè)壓力增加、區(qū)域差距擴(kuò)大、資源短缺和生態(tài)環(huán)境遭到破壞、社會(huì)的發(fā)展明顯滯后于經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展等等。從"九五"以來大力推進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長方式轉(zhuǎn)變，消耗一度下降，但近兩年有的地方卻出現(xiàn)了舊的粗放型增長方式回潮的勢頭。這些矛盾和問題，有些是在中國發(fā)展的現(xiàn)階段難以避免的，有些則是由于發(fā)展觀的偏差所導(dǎo)致的或者所加劇的。針對發(fā)展中實(shí)際存在的問題，提出樹立和落實(shí)全面、協(xié)調(diào)、可持續(xù)的發(fā)展觀，具有很強(qiáng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)針對性和緊迫性。

Second, the scientific concept of development is a necessary requirement to accomplish the objective of building a prosperous society in an all round way. To achieve this objective, great efforts must be made to improve the living standards in ruralChina, especially in the central and western parts ofChina. Efforts must also be made in urban areas where some 30 million people still lead comparatively poor lives. What should the government do to help the poor live a better life and spread the benefits of the reform and opening-up policy to all? This becomes an important task for the government to fulfill when it tries to build a prosperous society in an all-round way. To build a well-off society in an all-round way does not mean simple GDP growth. It also signifies societal development, environmental improvement, an enhancement of people's cultural life and ethical standards, and the comprehensive development of material, political and spiritual civilizations. To achieve the objective, we should change the former faulty understanding of development.

        其次，科學(xué)發(fā)展觀是實(shí)現(xiàn)黨的十六大提出的全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)目標(biāo)的客觀要求。實(shí)現(xiàn)全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)的目標(biāo)，難點(diǎn)在農(nóng)村，特別是在中西部地區(qū)的農(nóng)村。在城市里也有兩三千萬居民生活水平較低。怎樣才能讓城市和農(nóng)村中生活困難的群眾過上小康生活，充分享受到改革和發(fā)展的成果？這是全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)的重要任務(wù)。全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)的要求不光是追求GDP的指標(biāo)，它還應(yīng)包括社會(huì)的發(fā)展、環(huán)境的改善、文化生活和精神道德水平的提高，推動(dòng)物質(zhì)文明、精神文明和政治文明的全面發(fā)展。按照全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)的目標(biāo)和要求，需要我們轉(zhuǎn)變過去的發(fā)展觀念。

In the past five decades since the People's Republic ofChinawas founded, we have accumulated a series of successful experiences, such as building up a nationwide public medical system and strengthening compulsory education in rural areas. However, some of these good practices were not maintained during the economic transformation. Compared with the fast economic development inChina, social development obviously lagged behind, unable to meet the requirements of economic development and the needs of the people for material and cultural life. In addition, the unexpected SARS outbreak in 2003 reminded us that besides economic growth, there were many other issues that needed to be addressed promptly.

        在新中國成立50多年來的發(fā)展歷程中，我們有一些比較成功的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和做法，如建立社會(huì)公共衛(wèi)生體系、加強(qiáng)農(nóng)村義務(wù)教育等，然而這些好的做法卻在體制轉(zhuǎn)軌過程中有所流失。相對于我國經(jīng)濟(jì)高速發(fā)展的水平，社會(huì)領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展明顯滯后，不能適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的要求，更不能適應(yīng)人民對物質(zhì)、文化生活改善的要求。2003年非典疫情的突襲給我們敲響了警鐘。

Finally, after years of economic progress,Chinais now capable of solving previously unsolvable problems. To solve the problems inherent in social development, such as technological innovation, educational development, pollution control and ecological improvement, a large quantity of financial investment is required. In the past, when food and clothing were not adequate, the government made all of its efforts to increase supply and fulfill people’s fundamental needs for material life. Under such conditions, it was difficult for the government to spare efforts for other issues. However, thanks to the fast development in the past 20 years, the Chinese people have become prosperous by and large. The country has seen a remarkable rise in its economic strength. The per-capita GDP totaled US$1,000.

        最后，科學(xué)發(fā)展觀的提出也表明，我國目前經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的水平使我們有條件解決過去想解決而解決不了的問題。許多社會(huì)發(fā)展問題，如科技進(jìn)步、教育發(fā)展、環(huán)境治理、生態(tài)改善等，都需要大量資金投入。過去在溫飽問題還沒有得到解決的時(shí)候，我們不得不把主要精力放在增加供給，滿足人們最基本的物質(zhì)生活需求上，其他方面很難顧及到。經(jīng)過20多年的改革發(fā)展，我國已基本實(shí)現(xiàn)了小康，國家的財(cái)力和經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力有了明顯增長，人均GDP已經(jīng)達(dá)到1000美元。經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展到目前這種水平，我們有條件、也有能力解決過去想辦而沒有辦成的事情。

To keep economic development as the central task is naturally included in the Scientific Concept of Development.

        以經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)為中心是科學(xué)發(fā)展觀應(yīng)有之義。

Experts pointed out that to ensure the successful implementation of the Scientific Concept of Development, on one hand, we should correct a series of erroneous understandings, such as prioritizing economic growth over social development, prioritizing material output over the realization of men's values, and prioritizing immediate interests over long-term interests. On the other hand, we should clearly note that to conduct comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable development, we should always consider economic development as our primary task. The law of social development tells us that although economic growth is not the whole of development, it is the essence of development.

        專家們指出，樹立和落實(shí)科學(xué)發(fā)展觀，必須糾正一些地方和領(lǐng)域出現(xiàn)的重經(jīng)濟(jì)指標(biāo)，輕社會(huì)進(jìn)步；重物質(zhì)成果，輕人的價(jià)值；重眼前利益，輕長遠(yuǎn)福祉的偏頗。但我們必須清醒地認(rèn)識(shí)到，提出全面、協(xié)調(diào)、可持續(xù)的發(fā)展觀，并不意味著發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)已退居次要位置，更不意味著經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)不重要了。人類社會(huì)的發(fā)展規(guī)律昭示我們：經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展雖然不是發(fā)展的全部內(nèi)涵，卻是發(fā)展的核心內(nèi)涵。

Wang Mengkui, Director of theDevelopmentResearchCenterof the State Council, pointed out that the current prosperous situation inChinais mainly due to fast economic growth over the past two decades. The settlement of all those social problems is based on continuous economic achievement. In the past 20 years,Chinahas made much headway in economic development and institutional reform. Meanwhile, however, a great number of problems have cropped up. All the experiences we have acquired in domestic development and the development of other countries tell us that economic growth, especially GDP growth, should not be taken as the only index of social-economic development. The final aim of our development should be achieving a comprehensive social advancement on the basis of economic growth, thus to enhance the living standards of all people.

        國務(wù)院發(fā)展研究中心主任王夢奎明確指出：沒有過去20多年的高速增長，就沒有今天的大好局面。諸多社會(huì)問題的解決，也是以經(jīng)濟(jì)持續(xù)發(fā)展為基礎(chǔ)的。我國20多年來經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和體制改革中取得的成就和存在的問題以及國內(nèi)外的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和教訓(xùn)都說明：社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)，不是單純追求經(jīng)濟(jì)增長，更不是單純追求GDP的增長而是在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展基礎(chǔ)上實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)全面進(jìn)步，增進(jìn)全體人民的福利。

Chen Xiwen is the deputy director of the Leading Work Group of Financial and Economic Works of the CPC Central Committee. He is also a specialist on agricultural policies. Chen saidChinaused to concentrate on GDP growth alone. This was not real development. To Chen, if a local government achieved fast GDP increase by depriving farmers of their lands, works and even social securities, how could we call it development?

        中央財(cái)經(jīng)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)小組辦公室副主任、著名"三農(nóng)"問題專家陳錫文告訴記者，過去單純地追求GDP的增長不是真正的發(fā)展。GDP固然重要，但一個(gè)地方GDP增長很快，同時(shí)"三無（土地、崗位、保障）"農(nóng)民大量增加，怎么能叫發(fā)展呢？

All positive and negative experiences warn us that on one hand, we should not replace social development by pure economic pursuit, and on the other hand, we should not deny the key role of economic development in social advancement. On the whole, we should stick to the central task of economic development and strive for a balanced development of all resources to achieve comprehensive development within all of society.Chinahas a huge population but only a small amount of per-capita resources. Compared with the developed countries, it remains backward in many fields. Take an example: suppose the annual economic growth rate of theUSstands at 3 percent and that ofChina8 percent, it will takeChina68 years to enjoy a per-capita GDP equal to that of theUS. Suppose the annual economic growth rate of theUSstands at 4 percent and that ofChina7 percent, it will takeChina118 years to catch up with theUS.Chinais at the primary stage of socialism. The increase of material wealth should always be taken as the essence and fundamental issue of development. Without fast accumulation of material wealth, it is difficult for us to accomplish the objective of fostering balanced development.

        正反兩方面的實(shí)踐深刻地警示我們：既不能以經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展代替社會(huì)發(fā)展，也不能因?yàn)閺?qiáng)調(diào)發(fā)展的全面性而否定經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展在社會(huì)發(fā)展中的基礎(chǔ)地位。我們必須在堅(jiān)持經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)這個(gè)中心的基礎(chǔ)上，來統(tǒng)籌各方面，促進(jìn)全面發(fā)展。中國人口多，人均資源占有量少，同發(fā)達(dá)國家相比，還處于相對落后狀態(tài)。據(jù)專家測算，如果美國年增長率為3%，中國年增長率為8%，那么中國需要68年才能實(shí)現(xiàn)人均GDP與美國相當(dāng)；如果美國增長率為4%，中國增長率為7%，那么中國需要118年才能趕上美國。在整個(gè)社會(huì)主義初級(jí)階段，物質(zhì)財(cái)富的增長，始終是發(fā)展最核心、最基本的內(nèi)容，沒有物質(zhì)的快速增長，其他各方面協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的社會(huì)目標(biāo)就很難實(shí)現(xiàn)。